The Ordre des Conseillers en ressources humaines agréés (CRHA) [Order of Chartered Human Resource Managers] recently disciplined a manager employed by the Commission scolaire de Montréal (CSDM) who drafted and used discriminatory pre-hiring medical forms. 

The facts

A CSDM manager was instructed by management to draft pre-hiring medical forms for various positions within the school board (support employees, professionals, teachers, etc.).

However, no preliminary research was carried out in advance by the manager in order to ensure that questions of a medical nature put to candidates were tailored to the requirements or the capacities required to hold the job position(s).

On the contrary, the manager acknowledged that the questions were designed to manage costs related to social benefits and unemployment (wage) insurance and to filter out the candidates across a broad spectrum of positions […]”. In other words, the manager quite simply eliminated candidates likely to have an adverse impact on its insurance and CNESST records. 

She also admitted being aware that the questions set forth in the forms were probably controversial, but that it was worth the risk, in order to cut back” wage-loss replacement costs. 

The questions prepared by the manager in the job application procedure included the following: 

  1. Have you ever been a victim of a workplace accident or occupational disease? If so, please provide details of the nature of the workplace accident or occupational disease and, where applicable, the temporary or permanent disability suffered as a result of the accident or disease.
  2. Do you have an existing record on file with the Commission de la santé et de la sécurité du travail (CSST) ? If so, please provide details.
  3. Do you take any prescription medicine, either temporarily or permanently, or has a physician prescribed medication that you are required to take on a temporary or permanent basis? If so, please provide details. 

The decision

The disciplinary council of the CRHA fined the CSDM $2500 for breach of the following provision of the Code of ethics of the members of the Ordre des conseillers en ressources humaines et en relations industrielles agréés du Québec:

12. A member shall avoid any attitude or method which could harm the reputation of the profession and his proficiency to serve the public interest. He shall also avoid discriminatory, fraudulent or illegal practices and shall refuse to participate in such practices.”

She was ordered to refrain from participating in any selection process whatsoever for a period of six months, and to follow several training course dealing with discriminatory hiring practices.

Practical Tips

In our view, the penalty imposed on the CSDM is an important precedent to keep in mind for members of the CRHA. On occasion, standard form pre-hiring medical forms that are used or exchanged between colleagues working in other organizations without prior vetting risk being deemed discriminatory. As good practice, employers should ensure that the questions of a medical nature put to future candidates have to be relevant in the determination as to whether or not the applicant is fit to fulfil the tasks associated with the job posting. 

Courts in the past have ruled that employers may seek disclosure of the state of health of a candidate where his or her health may interfere with work performance or even imperil the safety of other workers. 

We recommend to employers that they be prudent in the drafting and use of their pre-hiring medical forms. For more certainty, it is advisable that questions of a medical nature should be directly related to the capacity of the candidate to perform the specific tasks and duties of the job posting.

For example: do you have a functional disability that might prevent you from totally or partially fulfilling the duties and tasks of the job you are applying for?

We would naturally be pleased to assist you in the event that you wish to draft or revise your pre-hiring medical forms.